On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Oh, it does. This atomics technique was tested at a customer's site and
> ready for upstream.
I'm not worried about the *original* patch. I'm worried about the
incremental one.
Your original patch never applied to my tree - I think it was based on
-mm or something. So I couldn't verify my "let's go back to the
explicit 'waiters'" incremental patch against reverting and
re-applying the original patch.
So I'd like you to re-verify that that incremental patch really is
solid, and does what your original one did.
Linus
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
