On 21 March 2014 20:18, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <sva...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Yeah, I had the driver written using driver_data to store pstates. > Gautham found the bug that we are missing one PState when we match the > ID with CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ!
I see.. > We did not know that you have taken care of those issues. Ideally > I did expect that driver_data should not be touched by the framework. > Thanks for fixing that and allowing the back-end driver to use > driver_data. No, I haven't fixed anything yet. And this piece of code still exists. I will see if I can get this fixed, by that time you can continue the way your code is there in this version. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
