On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 18:23 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:10:05PM +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> > + flash@2 {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + compatible = "eon,en25s64";
> > + reg = <2>;
> > + spi-max-frequency = <35000000>;
> > + };
>
> I won't hold up this patch due to this, but you should send a patch to
> add eon to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt.
at24, OTOH, looks wrong. Shouldn't it be atmel? How did "24" become
part of the vendor? I see lots of existing uses, though...
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
