Hi Mikey, > We only map what a user processes maps and we tear it down when the > process is teared down (on the file descriptor release). So I think > we are ok. > > Unless there's some lazy teardown you're alluding to that I'm missing?
I was trying to make sure things like the TLB batching code won't allow a tlbie to be postponed until after a CAPI mapping is destroyed. It's been ages since I looked at that part of the mm code. Anton _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
