On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 09:38:39AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 13:57 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> > +/*
> > + * These work without NUMA balancing but the kernel does not care. See the
> > + * comment in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> > + */
> > +static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
> > +{
> > +   return (pte_val(pte) &
> > +           (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_USER)) == _PAGE_PRESENT;
> > +}
> 
> I would add a comment clarifying that this only works for user pages,
> ie, this accessor will always return "true" for a kernel page on ppc.
> 

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h 
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 490bd6d..7b889a3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ static inline pgprot_t pte_pgprot(pte_t pte)  { return 
__pgprot(pte_val(pte) & PA
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
 /*
  * These work without NUMA balancing but the kernel does not care. See the
- * comment in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
+ * comment in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h . On powerpc, this will only
+ * work for user pages and always return true for kernel pages.
  */
 static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
 {

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to