On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 15:41 -0800, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> On 01/15/2015 02:19 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 11:44 -0800, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> >> On 01/15/2015 09:23 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> >>> The commit 3b8a3c010969 ("powerpc/pseries: Fix endiannes issue in RTAS
> >>> call from xmon") was fixing an endianness issue in the call made from
> >>> xmon to RTAS.
> >>>
> >>> However, as Michael Ellerman noticed, this fix was not complete, the
> >>> token value was not byte swapped. This lead to call an unexpected and
> >>> most of the time unexisting RTAS function, which is silently ignored
> >>> by RTAS.
> >>
> >> Nit. Not so much that is silently ignored by RTAS as much as
> >> disable_surveillance silently doesn't check the return status of the
> >> RTAS call. Maybe a check is warranted and reporting of non-success.
> >
> > Yeah you're right, I added a printf of the result and got -3, which is also
> > wrong as far as I can tell, but I didn't have the energy to chase it any
> > further.
>
> If this was on a powerkvm guest set-indicator should be present for
> hotplug (DLPAR) support. However, the surveillance indicator would not
> be implemented. I know sometimes I forget if I'm on a powervm or
> powerkvm guest. Just a thought.
Right that does explain it. I went looking for the KVM kernel/qemu code that
implements set-indicator but couldn't find it. Presumably it's in some branch
other than the one I was looking at, or I was grepping for the wrong thing.
So I guess a printf there is probably not helpful, because it will fire always
on PowerKVM (at least at the moment).
cheers
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
