On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:24:10AM +0000, Amit Tomar wrote:
> ISR should not return IRQ_HANDLED for not handling anything. 
> This patch fixes the return value of ISR for the same case.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar <amit.to...@freescale.com>

I can't apply the patch. There seem to be whitespace problems. Please
fix the patch or your mail sending.


> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c |    3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c 
> index 0edf630..7a3136f 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> @@ -95,8 +95,9 @@ static irqreturn_t mpc_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
>         i2c->interrupt = readb(i2c->base + MPC_I2C_SR);
>         writeb(0, i2c->base + MPC_I2C_SR);
>         wake_up(&i2c->queue);
> +       return IRQ_HANDLED;
>     }
> -  return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +  return IRQ_NONE;
> }
> 
> /* Sometimes 9th clock pulse isn't generated, and slave doesn't release
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>  
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to