On 8 June 2015 at 10:37, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org> wrote:
> [...]
>
>>> >
>>> >    Can you test this patch  on imx SoC ?
>>> >
>>>
>>> (Your email have some format issue.)
>>
>> Yeah missed to sent in plain text mode.
>>
>>>
>>> I have tested this patch and it does not break imx SoC.
>>> You can add my tag.
>>> Tested-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.d...@freescale.com>
>>
>> Thanks Dong !!
>>
>>>
>>> However, it looks to me SDHCI_CAN_VDD_180 is only indicating the host VDD
>>> capabiliies, not IO voltage capability.
>
> I think Dong is correct. I don't think SDHCI_CAN_VDD_180 is not

/s /is not /is

> related to UHS modes at all.
>
> At least the name of the field (SDHCI_CAN_VDD_180) indicates it's
> about VDD/VCC, the core power and not the IO voltage.
>
>> Are you sure on this ?? If SDHCI host VDD is  1.8V then the cards are
>> also capable to operate at 1.8V ? Didn't understand what you mean by
>> IO voltage capability
>>
>>
>>> SD3.0 cards require 1.8v IO voltage support.
>>> So should this bit affect SD3.0 support?
>>
>> The preset value resgister says that  SDR modes requires 1.8V and we
>> disable the modes based on capability or quirk.
>
> It requires 1.8V *IO voltage*, not VDD/VCC.
>
> [...]
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to