On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 03:56 -0500, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 1:47 AM > > To: Jia Hongtao-B38951 > > Cc: edubez...@gmail.com; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > > devicet...@vger.kernel.org; robh...@kernel.org; rui.zh...@intel.com > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] QorIQ/TMU: add TMU node to device tree for > > QorIQ > > T104x > > > > On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 21:19 -0500, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 3:38 AM > > > > To: Jia Hongtao-B38951 > > > > Cc: edubez...@gmail.com; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > > > > devicet...@vger.kernel.org; robh...@kernel.org; > > > > rui.zh...@intel.com > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] QorIQ/TMU: add TMU node to device tree > > > > for > > > > QorIQ T104x > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 01:33 -0500, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote: > > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1040si-post.dtsi > > > > > > b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1040si-post.dtsi > > > > > > index 15ae462..bb9f792 100644 > > > > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1040si-post.dtsi > > > > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1040si-post.dtsi > > > > > > @@ -345,6 +345,7 @@ > > > > > > reg = <0xea000 0x4000>; > > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > > > > > +/include/ "qoriq-tmu-t104xsi.dtsi" > > > > > > /include/ "elo3-dma-0.dtsi" > > > > > > /include/ "elo3-dma-1.dtsi" > > > > > > /include/ "qoriq-espi-0.dtsi" > > > > > > > > Why is this chip-specific enough to be called "t104xsi", but > > > > not > > > > chip- > > > > specific enough to just go directly into t1040si-post? > > The tmu node includes lots of contents. > Is it looks messy if just go directly into t1040si-post?
I don't think it's too much to go into the main file. Having too many files is a hassle as well... -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev