[Resending to updated e-mail address] On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 11:25 -0700, Michael Turquette wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Quoting Scott Wood (2015-06-18 19:49:10) > > The existing device tree bindings are error-prone and inflexible. > > Correct the mistake by moving the knowledge into the driver, which > > has more flexibility in describing the quirks of each chip. This leaves > > the device tree to its proper role of identifying a programming interface > > rather than describing its individual registers. > > Sorry for not responding to this one sooner. Fell through the cracks. > > All of the changes to drives/clk/clk-qoriq.c look great to me. I assume > you need to keep all of these patches together and want to the take > through the freescale tree? If so feel free to add, > > Acked-by: Michael Turquette <mturque...@baylibre.com>
Is the ack still valid for the v3 patchset? -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
