On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 18:31 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, Zhao Qiang wrote: > > > 127 is the theoretical up boundary of QEIC number, > > in fact there only be 44 qe_ic_info now. > > add check to overflow for qe_ic_info > > How do you trigger that overflow? The above does not explain WHY we need > these > checks.
The check in qe_ic_host_map can be triggered by bad data in a device tree. The set_priority functions do not appear to be used at all. > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c > > index 5419527..90c00b7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c > > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_ic.c > > Sigh. Another dump ground for SOC stuff? Another? Where are the others, besides arch? > irq chip drivers belong into drivers/irqchip. Yes. This stuff was recently moved out of arch/powerpc to work toward being able to use it on ARM. I'm expecting followup patches to move things like this that belong elsewhere. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev