On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 11:44 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 05:07:16PM -0600, Li Yang wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Raghav Dogra <rag...@freescale.com> > > wrote: > > > The new IFC controller version 2.0 has a different memory map page. > > > Upto IFC 1.4 PAGE size is 4 KB and from IFC2.0 PAGE size is 64KB. > > > This patch segregates the IFC global and runtime registers to > > > appropriate > > > PAGE sizes. > > > > If the global registers and the runtime registers are so independent > > that they have to be on different page boundaries, it would make more > > sense for them to be defined as separate reg regions in the device > > tree at the very beginning. Then we would only need to change the > > device tree now and it would be future proof for any page size. > > To be clear: Scott, you were NACK'ing the DT binding change request, > right? I though we had an Ack on the previous revision (that Raghav > failed to carry).
Yes. The patch is OK, the DT binding change (which is not in the patch) is not. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev