"Mark A. Greer" wrote: > Paul Mackerras wrote: > > > For now something like what you have suggested should be OK except > > that I would note that you could use the host->first_busno field, > > which already exists, instead of adding a new field. > > Oh man, DUH... > > Thanks Paul, I'll make the change & push it in.
Wait, I can't b/c then *everyone* will have this subtraction happen and everyone but me would be broken. With a separate field, I don't mess up other board ports. Another way to go would be to #ifdef your suggestion into indirect_pci.c for my board only. Which do you prefer? Mark ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
