In message <20030506081707.57165.qmail at web41813.mail.yahoo.com> you wrote: > > What are the limitations of the MPCBDM ?
- bound to a PC's parallel port (vs. the networked BDI) - slower downloads - only support for MPC8xx CPUs - only few flash types supported - only mailing list "support" - no warranty on the hardware > Is it possible to debug generic C/C++ code without > linux ? yes. > Whatr is the difference with BDI ? The BDI2000 is a high quality (3 years warranty on the hardware!), excellently supported (1 year support / software updates included), professional tool. The BDM4GDB is a do-it-yourself solution which costs only 2% of the price of a BDI2000. For that price you get a lot of functions, but it's still weak compared against a BDI2000. We have both in house (actually selling both of them), but use only BDI2000 for our daily work. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de Whenever people agree with me, I always think I must be wrong. - Oscar Wilde ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
