Mark Pilon wrote: > You might check the actual code generated for ffs() and verify > it works -- I ended up recoding this routine because ffs() wasn't > working correctly ... [ I forget the particulars, but the code > generated and behavior were not correct ];
It would be nice if you posted the particulars. This function is
used in a variety of places, and it appears to work just fine.
Thanks.
-- Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
