Hi all, I got a little problem that I cannot really understand. I wrote a little device driver for a 405 PPC board. The driver registers a miscdevice.
Normally all misc devices are listed under /proc/misc. My first attempt resulted in a /proc/misc looking like this: # cat /proc/misc 187 <- "test" is missing here ! 185 gpio The code is attached. When I change the init stuff for the miscdevice structure a little bit (see below with WORKING defined), I got the expected bahavior. Is this a relocation problem when loading the module ? In the two version the NAME string sits in different segments. Is there a way to fix the problem by a compiler switch ? Is this a PPC issue ? I noticed that the Linux rtc driver uses the same code as I do, but it does not have the problem. The difference is that my code is a lkm and mot compiled into the kernel. Matthias ... #define NAME "test" #define MINOR 187 #ifdef WORKING static char name[]=NAME; #endif static struct file_operations my_fops = { ... }; static struct miscdevice my_miscdev = { #ifdef WORKING name: name, // results in correct bahavior #else name: NAME, // results in missing module name in /proc/misc #endif minor: MINOR, fops: &my_fops }; int __init my_init(void) { misc_register(&my_miscdev); return 0; } void __exit my_exit(void) { misc_deregister(&my_miscdev); } module_init(my_init); module_exit(my_exit); ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/