On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 05:18:04PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote: > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > I'm sort-of supprised it works. > I told you, it's not that much to do... > :-) > > > Isn't: > > ((uint)0x....) > > in assembly bad? > > Hmm. Don't know. Maybe. But these are just DEFINES! So what should that > be bad?
Oh yeah, right.. Hmm, it probably won't break anything then.. > > I think we need to have all of these defines enclosed with the > > __ASSEMBLY__ test, but I can go fix that. > > At least spd8xx.h and tqm8xx.h don't have any #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ at > all!? (... waking up ...) Because the only C bits they had are now in <asm/ppcboot.h> which does the test right. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
