Hi >>Apparently, you've both worked out a version of bestcomm for 2.6. But >>you both based it on old code. (even non GPL). >> >> > >Terrible, may be its time to create special project for MPC5200 (if it >doesn't exist in somewhere in I-net)? First intention - sourceforge. >Comments/suggestions? > >Sylvain, Wolfgang I know you already have projects. But in case of >Sylvain, as I understand, his project on his homepage. >In case of Wolfgang, I'm not sure that DENX will happy to share their >internal CVS with all I-net for write access. Am I right? > > I personnaly use BitKeeper to maintain my trees. I can't provide write access to them because I don't administrate the server they are on, To write, you would need a ssh account and I juste have one for me and can't create others.
I try to publish what I'm doing in www.246tNt.com/mpc52xx/state.txt >>I've just tried just taking the newer one and stick it in 2.6 with the >>fec Gabor sent, but it just crashes so it need more work ;) Dale >>Farnsworth just said it'll look into it and porting new bestcomm as well. >> >> > >My fec port work ok. > > Based on old bestcomm or new ? >And CAN, RTC, and possible CRC32/16 (if it will fast enough) :). > > CAN is not on my personnal project list since I have nothing that uses so I couldn't test it anyway. RTC ? The MPC5200 can't save time AFAIK. And Linux should already 'count' time correctly I think. By CRC32/16 I guess you mean to use the BestComm DMA engine to implement the kernel CRC Library ? I'm not sure I've pushed PCI on my tree ( bk://bkbits.246tNt.com/linux-2.5-mpc52xx ) yesterday night. So if you're in position to test it please report ;) Sylvain ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/