Jean-Denis Boyer wrote:
> IMHO, I prefer the way it is handled in 2.4.18.
Ahhhh.....I see now. It took some time to get the _devel
updates into the stable tree. The spurious interrupt is
an artifact of the 8260 code not updated to match Ben's
generic PPC changes.
-- Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
