andrew may wrote: >On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:53:36PM +0000, Armin wrote: > >>John Tyner wrote: >> >>>I remember seeing something awhile ago about early boots, but I didn't >>>think it was for Walnut. Where is it/would it be? >>> >>>On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Armin wrote: >>> >>> >>>>John Tyner wrote: >>>> >> >>David G did something and he hit the head_4xx.S & ppc4xx_setup.c and a >>few header files imb405gp.h >> > >This patch is to remove the need for the BASE BAUD define. If we ever start >trying to get a single kernel to build for multiple 405 boards that run at >various clock rates it becomes helpful to calc the base baud for the serial >ports rather than forcing it at compile time. > ok, let me clean this sentence up a bit...
A single kernel for multiple 405 boards does not fit the current design goals of the 4xx port, so I hope there are better reasons for this patch. > > > ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/