On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:10:39AM -0500, Cameron, Steve wrote: > I'm using linuxppc_2_4. I thought that'd be more > stable than linuxppc_2_4_devel. Maybe that wasn't > such a good choice.
No, since linuxppc_2_4 doesn't have working 40x support in it. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/