Gabriel Paubert wrote:
>
> Nother do 601, 603, and a lot of others...
Oh, I believe they do..........but, I haven't been wrong lately,
so maybe it's my turn again :-).
> For a proof I just tested the sequence lwarx + stw + sync ....
OK, so I learned my one thing for the day, I'm going home now...
> Not even "in some other contexts".
That was a bad choice of words on my part. I should have used
"function scope" or something like that. I was responding to about
three different messages at the time, sorry.
-- Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
