On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Dan Malek wrote: > > On Mar 25, 2005, at 4:19 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > what is the proper tree to be using these days for a 2.6 kernel > > on 8xx? for the longest time, i've used the "bk" checkout from > > bkbits.net, but i see others now working with what looks like the > > latest stock 2.6.x release. > > I just use the latest kernel.org tree for everything. If I'm > submitting a patch, or working with someone else, I use the bk tree > just to be that little more up to date.
i just downloaded the 2.6.11-5 kernel source and was a bit nonplussed to discover that "8xx" wasn't in the list of choices for processor, until i noticed in the Kconfig file that 8xx depends on "BROKEN". oh, my. :-) live and learn. rday
