On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:43:27AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Cort Dougan writes: > > > How about killing the _2_4_devel tree? When I created it I want it to be a > > playground for stabilizing then moving things over to 2_4 failry quickly. > > It seems to have become the defacto "want board X, you better use > > _2_4_devel" tree. > > Now that Marcelo is using BK, what I would really like to do is to > kill both the linuxppc_2_4 and linuxppc_2_4_devel trees and move to a > tree that is a child of Marcelo's linux-2.4 tree.
... but old history? :) [snip] > ... There is no particular reason that I can see why the 8xx > stuff in 2_4_devel shouldn't go to Marcelo for 2.4.21. I'll try and get to that too, once finals are over :) -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
