On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:31:15PM +0000, Armin wrote: > andrew may wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 04:35:05PM +0000, Armin wrote: > > > >>Thanks, > >> > >>I want to try in on a few boards I have before it goes in. > >> > >>--armin > >> > > > > Have you gotten a chance to try it yet? The testing I have > > done has not shown any problems and I have been able to test > > just about all of the cases. Boards with/without the correct > > pull-ups. Remove the correct phy-id from the table. Booting > > without a link. > > > > Here is another patch that for the driver. It removes some > > cut and paste code from the rx interupts and breaks the work > > into rx_clean and rx_fill functions. rx_fill is also called from > > open. > > > > > Yes I have. > > I added history info and sent it to Tom to check in.
Thanks > > I will look into this patch and will try it after Tom gets done. Well I just noticed that building as a module is pretty far from working at the moment. Are there any plans to fix this? I am not sure how to cleanly get this working since there are all sorts of exports/externs that need to be fixed up. The tulip driver should be a good example, but it is broken off into it's own dir and I don't know if we want to do this for the ocp_enet as well. I can resend with a .h change and config.in change to pull the skb_res value out as a build option, but I want to see if anyone has any other comments before hand. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
