On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 04:37:42PM +0100, Stefano Coluccini wrote: > > > > Did you make sure it's getting the correct memory size? > > I think the problem is not there because the printks before the hang shows > the correct value (I have inserted the printouts of my boot process at the > bottom of the message) > > > Assuming you're > > trying to port into the existing prep_* framework, it does use residual > > data to determine memory size. That used to be reasonable but the > > newer MCG boards are not providing any useful information in > > residual data, I'd imagine this is also the case with the 5100. That's > > why the new MCG ports in the development tree no longer rely on residual > > data. > > Yes, I'm working on prep_* framework, but the residual seems significant and > correct (to my un-expert eyes :-)
Ok, well, it was just a guess. To be honest, I'd throw my Abatron on there at this point. The alternative is a liberal sprinkling of printk's and/or kgdb unless somebody else has a strong clue as to the source of the problem. -- Matt Porter MontaVista Software, Inc. mporter at mvista.com ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
