> > > > > > Comments? Anyone care to do some benchmarking? > > > > No comments so far, no one interested in this? > I'm interested! Indeed, I adapted and tested your patch in a 8260 FCC fast > ethernet driver and it worked fine I had a 20% increase in routing > throughput with the patch installed!
Cool! > > The bug fix in set_multicast_list worked too. But, since there's a continue > clause inside the for command in this routine, I would suggest that the > (dmi=dmi->next) command go inside the for increment clause, instead of the > place you've put it; that is: > for (...;...; i++, dmi = dmi->next) {...} Yes thats better, thanks. > > > > A question, why do enet.c pass bad frames to netif_rx? Only late collisions > > are disregarded, the rest is passed on. > IMHO, this is another bug... me too. Jocke ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/