On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 11:26:39AM -0800, Ron Bianco wrote: > We've been working with the 2.3.16 port from MontaVista. > There are problems as this port was based on an experimental and unstable > kernel.
I'm not quite sure what's in the 2.3.16 port specifically, but your easiest route would probably be the 2.4.x-testxx kernels, specifically the ones from the 2_5 bitkeeper tree (http://www.fsmlabs.com/linuxppcbk.html, 2_5 is on 5005) as it's somewhat similar to 2.3.16 (so it shouldn't be too hard to get your changes applied) and other 82xx boards are currently working anyways. Of course, Dan should probably speak up, as I'm just getting the hang of all this stuff. :) -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
