Sorry, but I'm not in a position to discuss product roadmaps. The kinds of technical questions are best handled by regular sales channels.
Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Mohammad Sadegh Sadri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 2:04 AM > To: Stephen Neuendorffer; Koss, Mike (Mission Systems); linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > Subject: RE: Compile time error, compiling Xilinx Linux 2.6 for XPS LLTEMAC > > Ok, thanks for guidance, > > by the way it is interesting for me to hear about EDK 10.1 from u steve, > EDK 9.2 has been around just for a little time and you are going to 10.1? > > What about future plan of xilinx about Virtex-5 FX? does this tool consider that? > the future plan is really important for our development team. let me give a simple example, our dev > team worked on the design of our system based on PLB and OPB buses for some thing near 6 month, just > then EDK 9.2.02 released and suddenly we forced to change all of the designs and to define new > activities specially focusing on MPMC. we did never consider MPMC before, but the release of EDK 9.2 > changed every thing. > > Now, that would be nice, if we can know your future plan a little, that would help us to generate > correct and real gant charts. and to assign human resources correctly. this is also true for the > project budget. We know that Virtex-5 devices are really capable of doing better things than Virtex- > 4, specially the PCI express option is great and very usable for us, but we have not moved to virtex- > 5 yet, because there is no FX series or at least we do not know your plan about it. Our managers we > seriously asking us if we have to move to Virtex-5 soon, we did not have any reasonable answer for > them because we do not have any info from u at all. > > thanks > > > > ________________________________ > > Subject: RE: Compile time error, compiling Xilinx Linux 2.6 for XPS LLTEMAC > Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:43:33 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > > > > Ah, thanks mike... you knocked the answer loose out of my brain... > > In EDK 9.2., the ll_temac generates either SDMA or FIFO defines, as necessary. > The platform data structure contains entries for both, with the correct ones being ignored. In > order to get the code to compile, there are some defines in xparameters.h which have: > > #ifndef XPAR_LLTEMAC_0_LLINK_CONNECTED_FIFO_INTR > #define XPAR_LLTEMAC_0_LLINK_CONNECTED_FIFO_INTR 0xdeadbeef > #endif > #ifndef XPAR_LLTEMAC_0_LLINK_CONNECTED_DMATX_INTR > #define XPAR_LLTEMAC_0_LLINK_CONNECTED_DMATX_INTR 0xdeadbeef > #endif > #ifndef XPAR_LLTEMAC_0_LLINK_CONNECTED_DMARX_INTR > #define XPAR_LLTEMAC_0_LLINK_CONNECTED_DMARX_INTR 0xdeadbeef > #endif > > after including xparameter_ml403.h > > I'm guessing maybe you overwrote the xparameters.h file and got rid of these redefines? You > can define it to be whatever you want, since the value will be ignored if you are using SDMA. > > In EDK 10.1, the BSP generator will always generate all the defines (even ones which are not > sensible in the current configuration), which avoids the above annoyances. > > Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Koss, Mike > (Mission Systems) > Sent: Sat 3/15/2008 9:12 PM > To: Mohammad Sadegh Sadri; linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > Subject: RE: Compile time error, compiling Xilinx Linux 2.6 for XPS LLTEMAC > > That interrupt is defined if you build a xps_ll_temac with the > xps_ll_fifo interface. Since you already stated that you're using the > mpmc, I'm going to assume that you have it connected to a SDMA > controller on the mpmc. As such the driver should be looking for that > definition, and not the FIFO interrupt. I don't have your version of the > virtex_devices.c to have a reference as to how the platform device is > being defined, so hopefully either Stephen N can chime in w/ more > information, or point me to the version of the virtex_devices.c that > you're using and I can try to provide some more assistance. > > -- Mike > > ________________________________ > > From: Mohammad Sadegh Sadri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 4:31 AM > To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > Subject: Compile time error, compiling Xilinx Linux 2.6 for XPS LLTEMAC > > > All, > > that should be a small problem, and i think that its solution should be > simple, > > I generate a base system using EDK 9.2.02 , the base system contains > XPS_LL_TEMAC , MPMC and other components, > I generate the software libraries and copy xparameters file into proper > kernel folder. I configure that kernel and add kernel support for > XPS_LL_TEMAC. > > while doing make I encounter this error: > > arch/ppc/syslib/virtex_devices.c:455: error: > 'XPAR_LLTEMAC_0_LLINK_CONNECTED_FIFO_INTR' undeclared here (not in a > function) > > I think that this definition should be available in xparameters_ml403.h > file but i see that there is no such definition. > I added a dummy definition for myself there to complete kernel > compilation, don't know the correct value for it of course. > > thanks > > > > ________________________________ > > Access your files from anywhere with Windows Live SkyDrive! Sign up now > and get 5GB of space FREE! <http://g.msn.ca/ca55/209> > > > > > > ________________________________ > > Is your lingo strong enough to ace these new word puzzles from Live Search Games? Click here to test > your vocab! <http://g.msn.ca/ca55/214> _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
