> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 1:19 PM > To: Petr Kulhavy <br...@jikos.cz> > Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] clock: fix possible buffer overrun > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:58:19PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote: > > Did I miss something? What is the reason then? > > Never mind, this is snprintf() and not strncpy(). > > The original code was confused and misleading using 31 (but not really > incorrect either). > > Thanks, > Richard
in GCC7, snprintf would now complain about possible truncation if you used size 31. Thanks, Jake > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Linuxptp-devel mailing list > Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
