Thursday, September 13, 2018 5:01 PM > Thanks for the explanation. > Wouldn't it make more sense to allow adding ports on-the-fly?
> The code is ready for this (or at least, someone did the ground work a > few years ago). Yes, that would be great also but it will not solve the clockIdentity problem since the Identity will stay the same until next restart. And it the port setup is different, the identity will change. (and the connented slaves for example will have to "change" gm if stack is acting as gm) . I can look into the port on-the-fly later Should I update the patch with ptp4l.8 then? /anders _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
