On 3/9/2020 7:27 AM, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 07:16:23 -0700, Richard Cochran wrote: >> But maybe that wouldn't be worst thing in the world. There is a trade >> off between maintaining parallel copies of ptp_clock_caps and the >> convenience of compiling the stack just once with the "future" kernel >> definitions. >> >> Thoughts? > > The decision is ultimately yours but I'd prefer the copy of the struct > in missing.h. > > Thanks, > > Jiri >
It would be my preference as well to keep a copy in missing.h Thanks, Jake _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
