How do you want to call the 64 bits?
I think that naming should be consistence.

Erez

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com> 
Sent: Thursday, 11 March 2021 04:12
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R&D 3) <erez.geva....@siemens.com>
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Explicit length byte order swap 
functions.

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:17:48PM +0100, Erez Geva wrote:
> Replace byte order with explicit length.
> 
> Add function for byte order for 64 bits.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Erez Geva <erez.geva....@siemens.com>
> ---
>  clock.c     |   4 +-
>  msg.c       |  51 ++++++-------
>  nsm.c       |   2 +-
>  port.c      |   5 +-
>  raw.c       |  10 +--
>  tc.c        |   8 +-
>  tlv.c       | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  transport.c |   9 ++-
>  udp.c       |   6 +-
>  udp6.c      |   4 +-
>  util.h      |  67 +++++++++++++++++
>  11 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/clock.c b/clock.c
> index 7005636..5b3b4d0 100644
> --- a/clock.c
> +++ b/clock.c
> @@ -255,12 +255,12 @@ void clock_send_notification(struct clock *c, struct 
> ptp_message *msg,
>               if (!event_bitmask_get(s->events, event))
>                       continue;
>               /* send event */
> -             msg->header.sequenceId = htons(s->sequenceId);
> +             msg->header.sequenceId = hton16(s->sequenceId);

I really don't see any improvement here.

Sorry,
Richard


_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Reply via email to