> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2021 2:08 AM
> To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v3 4/5] port: Don't renew raw transport.
> 
> Renewing of the transport on announce/sync timeout is needed in the
> client-only mode to avoid getting stuck with a broken multicast socket
> when the link goes down.
> 
> This shouldn't be necessary with the raw transport. Closing and binding
> of raw sockets can apparently be so slow that it triggers a false
> positive in the clock check.
> 
> Reported-by: Amar Subramanyam <asubraman...@altiostar.com>
> Signed-off-by: Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com>
> ---

Makes sense.

Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>

>  port.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/port.c b/port.c
> index fb420fb..6bf0684 100644
> --- a/port.c
> +++ b/port.c
> @@ -1806,6 +1806,12 @@ static int port_renew_transport(struct port *p)
>       if (!port_is_enabled(p)) {
>               return 0;
>       }
> +
> +     /* Closing and binding of raw sockets is too slow and unnecessary */
> +     if (transport_type(p->trp) == TRANS_IEEE_802_3) {
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +
>       transport_close(p->trp, &p->fda);
>       port_clear_fda(p, FD_FIRST_TIMER);
>       res = transport_open(p->trp, p->iface, &p->fda, p->timestamping);
> --
> 2.26.3
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxptp-devel mailing list
> Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel


_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Reply via email to