Hello Richard, Thanks o lot for your insight. Since you are overloaded with ptp4l patches, we will try to find another place for our synce4l application.
All the best, Michał Michalik > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Cochran <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2022 5:15 AM > To: Michalik, Michal <[email protected]> > Cc: Greg Armstrong <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; Kubalewski, Arkadiusz > <[email protected]>; Miroslav Lichvar <[email protected]>; > Erez <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 00/11] synce4l: add software for > Synchronous Ethernet > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 04:24:47PM +0000, Michalik, Michal wrote: > > > Richard - since you obviously have the last word, would you mind to state > > your > > final decision clearly to avoid any further interpretations of your answer? > > As it is, I am really not even keeping up with the PTP patches, and so > I really cannot look after either of these SyncE programs. > > > Btw. We also considering contributing your project, if that gets more > > traction > > and would at some time look more promising. What I am concerned about right > > now > > looking at it, it seems really hardware specific. We aimed to avoid that at > > all > > cost - our application is not connected to Intel HW at all - it can be used > > with NIC of > > any vendor. > > I think the ideal solution would be a new project that combines the > best aspects of both efforts. > > If that can't happen, then I would suggest adopting two distinct names > for the binaries, like: > > - synce4l > - synced > > The second one has a nice ring to it, don't you think? > > Thanks, > Richard > _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
