On Thu, 22 Jun, 2023 12:11:05 +0200 Erez <erezge...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 01:13, Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshb...@nvidia.com> wrote: > > Hi Erez, > > On Wed, 21 Jun, 2023 00:33:28 +0200 Erez <erezge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > You already submitted the patch seria. > > Has it changed? > > Yes, I took feedback from the RFC (request for comments) I sent out and > applied it in this submission. In the git notes field in the first patch > of the series, I document the change made since the RFC. Since the first > submission was an RFC, I did not treat it as a formal submission, so I > did not consider it a v1 but rather a draft. I submitted as an RFC due > to pending kernel side changes. > > > If so, please mark it with version 2. "git format-patch -v 2". > > I agree with this if a formal v1 was submitted. However since my > previous submission was an RFC, is the practice still to increment the > official submission as v2? > > Rahul, all patches are for review. > Do not make our life too much sophisticated.
Ack. > Just add a version tag, please. Whether you add an RFC or not. > If you really must , you can add a note in the cover letter for Richard. Noted for future submissions. Thanks for the clarification. Thanks, Rahul _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
