On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 12:30:38PM +0200, Stephan Wurm wrote:
> diff --git a/fsm.h b/fsm.h
> index 857af05..919e934 100644
> --- a/fsm.h
> +++ b/fsm.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum port_state {
> PS_PASSIVE,
> PS_UNCALIBRATED,
> PS_SLAVE,
> + PS_PASSIVE_SLAVE, /*according to IEC 62439-3 doubly attached clocks*/
NAK. There is no such state in IEEE 1588.
> PS_GRAND_MASTER, /*non-standard extension*/
> };
>
> @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ enum fsm_event {
> EV_RS_GRAND_MASTER,
> EV_RS_SLAVE,
> EV_RS_PASSIVE,
> + EV_RS_PSLAVE, /*according to IEC 62439-3 doubly attached clocks*/
There is no such recommended state event.
If you "profile" invents a new BMCA, then you should implement it
explictily.
We have ptp_fsm() and ptp_slave_fsm(), and you really should add
ptp_iec_whatevet_fsm() rather than hacking in specialy cases to the
1588 state machines.
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
