On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 05:32:38PM +0100, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 04:15:46PM +0000, Chandra Mallela wrote: > > Could you elaborate your experience with the ptp4l performance? > > I never tried 512 Syncs per second, nor do I see any reason to run > such a high rate. What is that supposed to achieve?
I'm wondering that too. Even if we assume a very unstable clock, the clock resolution and jitter would have to be somewhere in low picoseconds to -9 provide any theoretical improvement over -8. -- Miroslav Lichvar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
