Thank you for the replies, On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:17:23 -0700 "Gary E. Miller" <g...@rellim.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:09:29 +0100 > Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Wireless PTP is not going to work very well. I recommend using NTP > > instead. > > Let us not make this a PTP vs. NTP thing. There is ongoing work to > use the low level PTP mechanisms with NTP. They can work together, > and in the near future they will work even better together. > > But I agree, you will get much better results with the RasPi ethernet > over its WiFi. Maybe this user does not have the wired option. I am working on a project where the raspberries are built into racing slot cars and an access point, so I can't be extremely strict on the level of accuracy. PTP still sounds like the better option so I will test it using PPS signal and an osciloscope and tweak the servo and filter parameters. Simon Wernisch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
