Thanks Richard. I'll try the pmc. -----Original Message----- From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 2:05 PM To: Li, Baoqian <baoqian...@intel.com> Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] ptp4l slave behind a BC reports GM as master clock
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 01:59:22AM +0000, Li, Baoqian wrote: > Given the slave is sync with BC directly and there is no direct interaction > between GM and slave, reporting ff4cff as "best master clock" seems a bit > confusing. Not to me. > Is it better to report like "best master clock a1e830, grand master ff4cff" > or "parent port a1e830, grand master ff4cff"? If you want this kind of detailed reporting, just use the management interface. Thanks, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
