On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 09:34:37PM +0000, Jim Rucker wrote: > Hello. We have a small network with a master, a switch that correctly adds > peer-response corrections and 2 slaves. When 1 of the slaves is on everything > is fine. However, if we run ptp4l on both slaves at the same time we get > "rogue peer delay response" errors on both. It looks like the ptp4l slaves > are getting the path_delay_resp from the other slave node and erroring out > because the slave doesn't have an outstanding peer_delay_req. > Since the peer delay req/resp are all multicast we can't expect the switch to > stop these packets from reaching the other slaves, so how do we fix this? Is > there a configuration option that would help?
Make sure all of the P2P links are point to point. You can't use a switch in P2P network, unless that switch is a P2P Transparent Clock. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
