On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 04:57:25PM +0100, Martin Pecka wrote: > So it seems the card timestamps FOLLOW_UP and DELAY_RESP packets, but does > not timestamp SYNC packets. Why could this be? Can it somehow mismatch SYNC > and FOLLOW_UP messages in the chip and stamp the wrong one? (I think > FOLLOW_UP stamps are not good for anything, are they?). Or is it still some > problem with ptp4l not reading the socket?
No, no, NO! The msg_sots_missing() function checks the message type. It always returns FALSE (zero) for non-event messages like FOLLOW_UP. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
