Hi Maciek, Op 09-07-2022 om 08:44 schreef Maciek Machnikowski:
The ntpshm servo will put results in the shm and let the other entity to control the clock - hence it doesn't lock itself and always returns theSERVO_UNLOCKED.
Right.
I'd recommend setting up ptp4l with one of regular servos and use the phc2sys to transfer the offset to the NTP daemon.
But that wouldn't work iwith software time stamping, would it? Thanks. -- Marco
-----Original Message----- From: Marco Davids (SIDN) via Linuxptp-users <linuxptp- us...@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Friday, July 8, 2022 11:04 PM To: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Linuxptp-users] clock_servo ntpshm question Hi, So, I decided to configure 'clock_servo ntpshm' to use LinuxPTP as a 'refclock' for an NTP-daemon on a server with software time stamping. And it appeared to worked well, until I looked a bit closer. I noticed that with 'ntpshm' the servo state remains 's0' and the port state remains UNCALIBRATED. By choosing 'linreg' and enable the 'local' refclock in NTP I got it working as expected, but I find this a suboptimal solution. So, I would like to understand why ptp4l won't move to 's2' / SLAVE status in servo_clock ntpshm mode. Anyone? Thanks! -- Marco
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users