On 12/24/05, Constantine 'Gus' Fantanas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hmmmm, OK. What kind of graphics do most Thinkpads have then?
CF
Ben West wrote:
> most thinkpads don't have ati graphics, and those that do would be
> considered exceptions, or their ATI components 'caveats'.
> also 32-bit doesn't have a lot to do with linux -compaitible as linus
> rnns fin on the 64-bit processors.
>
>
> On 12/24/05, *Constantine 'Gus' Fantanas* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Hello all.
>
> With all this recent talk about ATI vs. nVidia in this board, I have
> this question: If ATI support for Linux is that bad, then how
> come and
> the Thinkpads are considered so Linux-friendly? Granted, all
> Thinkpads
> are 32-bit machines, but still, they are equipped with ATI
> graphics. Am
> I missing anything?
>
> CF
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxR3000 mailing list
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.pcxperience.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxr3000
> Wiki at http://prinsig.se/weekee/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxR3000 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.pcxperience.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxr3000
> Wiki at http://prinsig.se/weekee/
_______________________________________________
LinuxR3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pcxperience.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxr3000
Wiki at http://prinsig.se/weekee/
_______________________________________________ LinuxR3000 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pcxperience.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxr3000 Wiki at http://prinsig.se/weekee/
