On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 00:06 -0700, John Jason Jordan wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 01:00:42 -0400 > "Constantine 'Gus' Fantanas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dijo: > > > > I played with it for a bit, but left wifi for last. I was so pleased that > > > I was able to get Firefox-64 1.5 with RealPlayer and Flash, and Adobe > > > Reader 7.0 all running without needing the 32-bit chroot that I had to > > > use with Breezy > > > --How can that be? Isn't flashplayer offered as a 32-bit plugin in > > binary only? Since when can the 64-bit Firefox invoke 32-bit plugins? > > This must be a welcome change! So we do not need the 32-bit Firefox at all? > > Not any more. Dapper-64 comes with the 32-bit libraries, and they have > fixed things so that you can install 32-bit apps that don't have a > 64-bit binary by using force-architecture. The Ubuntu forums have lots > of discussion of it.
Err.. This is just a description of multilib. I believe the comment refers to running a 32bit plugin within a 64bit firefox. The enabling technology for that is:: http://www.gibix.net/dokuwiki/en:projects:nspluginwrapper Note: I'm not an Ubuntu user but google tells me Dapper shipped with nspluginwrapper. -Toshio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ LinuxR3000 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pcxperience.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxr3000 Wiki at http://prinsig.se/weekee/
