On 10/11/2011 12:48 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: > Just to let people know that I have updated the RDT branch with the > extension and plug-in necessary to allow RDT to be optionally connected > with Autotools. > > The extension lists the nature id it supports so in theory, we could > support alternates to RDT some day if desired. > > The shared code checks the project nature and at the moment just looks > for the RDT remote nature. If not found, it uses local proxies for file > access, launching, and the platform OS. If the RDT nature is found, it > looks for the extension that supports the RDT nature and then gets a > factory which returns the proxies for file access, launching, and > retrieving the platform OS (needed in the case of Windows support). > > I'd appreciate any comments folks have on this branch. > > I tend to like it because RDT is optional. We are free to support other > forms or multiple forms of remote project strategy if desired. > > I also have a branch whereby I have direct RDT calls in Autotools. If > people are interested, I can make that branch public as well. > > -- Jeff J.
Jeff, I just tried building your rdt branch and am getting one compilation error that I don't know how to resolve: Name clash: The method getAdapter(Class<?>) of type IAutotoolsEditor has the same erasure as getAdapter(Class) of type IAdaptable but does not override it IAutotoolsEditor.java /org.eclipse.linuxtools.cdt.autotools.ui/src/org/eclipse/linuxtools/cdt/autotools/ui/editors line 9 Java Problem Any ideas? I'm using the IBM Java compiler, so maybe the OpenJDK doesn't complain about this? - Corey _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
