+1
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Marc Khouzam <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > Also, I don't think that preferences should be labeled by project name. > Users should not need to know that some preferences are from the Linux > Tools project > or from the CDT project. > > Therefore I think things like Gcov, and other C/C++ preferences provided > by Linux Tools > should go under C/C++, but not using a "Linux Tools" category. > > The goal in the end is to provide a united solution for C/C++ users. > > Thanks > > Marc > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Andrew Overholt > *Sent:* Friday, April 05, 2013 11:14 AM > *To:* Linux Tools developer discussions > *Subject:* Re: [linuxtools-dev] preference pages > > The problem is that some of these aren't C/C++ and not all of them are > Linux-focused :) > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Xavier Raynaud > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm currently working on some preference pages for gcov and gprof, and I >> discovered that there is no root categrory for linuxtools preference pages. >> Changelog, Gcov, Library Hover, Man pages, SystemTap, Tracing preferences >> are all at root level of the eclipse preferences. >> >> What about creating a "LinuxTools" root page for all of them ? >> Perhaps also move it into "C/C++" category ? >> >> What's your opinion on that ? >> >> Xavier >> ______________________________**_________________ >> linuxtools-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-**dev<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > linuxtools-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev > >
_______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
