Hi Alex

Everything works fine from LTTng point of view. Thanks for the changes.

Best Regards
Bernd

This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer <http://www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer>
On 08/29/2013 11:11 AM, Bernd Hufmann wrote:
Hi Alex

Yes, LTTng has a separate releng. I'll going to check if everything works fine from LTTng point of view. I'll let you know.

Thanks
Bernd




On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov <akurt...@redhat.com <mailto:akurt...@redhat.com>> wrote:

    Note to all,
    I pushed
    
http://git.eclipse.org/c/linuxtools/org.eclipse.linuxtools.git/commit/?id=9caea339a90b37d3cb638b625e61402deddaee17
    without review in order to be able to test it.
    Using platform instead of sdk is the right thing to do and
    according to hudson
    (https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/linuxtools-master/1567/) no
    test failed because of that.
    Let me know if it causes any problems so I can look at it and fix.
    Note to LTTng guys - I touched your tests too so please verify
    with your separate releng (you have one, right?).

    Alexander Kurtakov
    Red Hat Eclipse team

    _______________________________________________
    linuxtools-dev mailing list
    linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org <mailto:linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org>
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev




_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Reply via email to