> Dmitry, > Would you please clarify this? Do you mean that a patch was not reviewed or > rejected without reasoning or that none of the current committers was > interested in working on this at the time? > > If nothing else Linux Tools tries to be really open so please refer to the > bugzilla or gerrit patch in case your contribution was rejected for the > publicity record. > We don't have endless manpower but we always try to onboard people interested > in working on Linux Tools according to EDP and I see this as one of the > biggest virtues of the projects so if we failed on doing that I would like > to check it myself and learn where a mistake was made. > P.S. I made have replied or not but my memory is vague about it.
I believe Dmitry is referring to https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=376043 . There was another implementation submitted that matched more closely with how other plugins' remote capabilities were being done (ie. through PTP). Cheers, -- Roland Grunberg _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
