Great! Ok we just discussed it, we still have a couple patches pending for lttng-luna, so we'll try to get them in today. We'll merge luna into master tomorrow.
Thanks, Alexandre On 13-12-04 12:52 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > No need to wait at all. Master is open for luna now and parent pom set to 3.0. > > Alexander Kurtakov > Red Hat Eclipse team > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Alexandre Montplaisir" <alexmon...@voxpopuli.im> >> To: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" <akurt...@redhat.com> >> Cc: "Linux Tools developer discussions" <linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 7:43:22 PM >> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Lttng and Luna >> >> Hi Alexander, >> >> I'd like to merge lttng-luna in as soon as possible. Should we wait for >> something to be changed in master before we do so? >> >> As far as I can tell, we don't use anything that is Luna-specific (I >> always use the 4.3 target definition to compile). >> >> >> Thanks, >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 13-12-04 11:05 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: >>> Lttng devs, >>> What is your plan to merge lttng-luna branch into master and killing >>> lttng-luna branch? >>> Do you use any luna specific APIs making it impossible to compile against >>> Kepler platform? PTP changed the remote tools so we would need a bit more >>> time before we can start compiling against Luna release train in master >>> (unless someone jumps in to help). Let's get 3.0 discussion ongoing with >>> this mail and add anything you were think of. >>> >>> Alexander Kurtakov >>> Red Hat Eclipse team >> _______________________________________________ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
